6. D. R.Serfell (JM)
Dag. on 55533/477 I. P. Danceft (y)
Thiss whyte
M Wallace
1947.
6
20-11-47
1.F.16/10/02
21,
To see Nos 6 and
ج.
bedilatera Dos Sabre
the war
I have
a
aolé
that before the
the Governor had to
obtain the loss; pro
approval under Col. Reg 265 for additional
expenditure in excess
where
no
of $10,000 ($625).
question of principle arose.
That appears to me
limit
and
to be a
low
very
Qurul
must have involved
unnecessay comespondence.
the Castern Dest
To for
is concerned
we
do
not want
16
to be
bothered with requests for approval of comparitively small amounts additional expenditure where no poist I principle arises, and subject to the comments of the Finance Dept- I would suggest that the limits under Cool deg 265-
of
should
be
(9). non-recurrent $50,000 (£3,125)
te e-current-
$25,000 (£1562-103)
ал
subject to the
the same
understanding
Col. Reg
No. 278
para 2 of No. 7.
As
regards
I believe that
all
Governors
during
wear
were required to seek
auchority for writes-off' involving auctorily for writes
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.